Linux reliability as demonstrated by Ubuntu 11.4

technology: 

Ubuntu Linux is a mix of the conservative stable Debian Linux and the latest software. Ubuntu is the Linux you choose when you want Debian updated with the latest hardware drivers. The latest software is often unstable and may make your computer difficult to use. Sometimes the best approach is to use the latest version of Ubuntu to get the new hardware drivers but then switch off other new features for stability.

Fedora competes with Ubuntu for a similar market. Both are updated every six months. Their updates arrive three months apart. For three months, Ubuntu is the most up to date then Fedora is the most up to date for three months. After installation, both will immediately connect online and download the latest updates.

Installation has to work up to the point where you can connect to a network for the update. After the connection you can get the latest available versions of everything. If the installation fails to work up to the network connection, you may have to switch to the another version of Linux. For most installations, either Ubuntu works or both Ubuntu and Fedora fail. Occasionally Ubuntu fails and Fedora works.

On rare occasions I have also resorted to CentOS and Debian unstable because Ubuntu and Fedora have a new driver that does not work. I also used CentOS for compatibility with hosted Web sites based on CentOS. Now I use the Ubuntu alternate download to get a wider range of configuration options.

Ubuntu has an LTS version with LTS standing for Long Term Support. Ubuntu 10.4 and 11.4, the April releases, are LTS versions. The October releases of Ubuntu, 10.10 and the future 11.10, are not LTS. There appears to be no difference in stability. Ubuntu 10 is more stable than Ubuntu 9. Will Ubuntu 11 be better?

Ubuntu 11.4 beta 2 is more stable than Ubuntu 10 if you switch off the new Unity interface. The two big changes between Ubuntu 11 and 10 are Firefox 4 and the new Unity interface replacing Gnome version 2. Firefox 4 appears to be more stable than Firefox 3.5. Unity is less stable than Gnome. If you switch off Unity, Ubuntu 11.4 is the most stable Ubuntu so far and should be better when out of beta.

Gnome has two levels, with effects and without effects. I switch off the effects because some of the effects interfere visually and some chew up processing time. I prefer the cleaner faster interface without effects. Effects are aimed more at people who want to use their computer for entertainment or to show off in front of friends. People brought up on Apple computers will want effects on. I have not found any stability problems from using effects. There are reports of problems with some graphics chips and some of the problems are bypassed by switching off effects.

Unity was originally tried on a special netbook edition of Ubuntu and made better use of the short wide screens on current netbooks. The cost is a lot of junk processing and annoying pop-in effects. You might need the pop-in effects on a netbook with a small screen. On a medium size netbook with a 10" screen, the pop-in effects are annoying time wasters. I did not find a way to switch Unity features off individually. Switching from Unity back to Gnome is quicker and easier.

The effects in Gnome and Unity require the most complicated features of the latest graphics chips. If your computer has a new graphics chip and Linux has a problem with the chip, try Gnome with effects off. Gnome should then use only the less complicated features of the graphics chip. If you still have problems, you may have to access Linux using the 1950s style Linux/Unix/DOS command box and manually download graphics drivers. I prefer to give up before resorting to the command line and switch to a different distribution of Linux.

The next instability in Linux will be the switch from disks with 512 byte sectors to disks with 4096 byte sectors. Linux is already ahead of Windows in this area. Mac OSX should be the same as Linux because OSX is Unix with shiny wallpaper glued on the front. Anything new in Linux should be quickly available in Unix then Apple can copy all the free work from the open source community and sell it to Apple customers. you should only hit the 4096 byte sector problem when using disks larger than 2 GigaBytes.

Most chips are stable. SATA is becoming faster but is not changing the way SATA communicates. USB is becoming faster and USB 3 does use a different socket but the basic protocol is not changing and the chips should look the same to the operating system.

Graphics and wireless network chips are evolving rapidly. Graphics chips are always changing. Wireless network chips are implementing changes for the 802.11n protocol then should settle down for a while.

Touch screens are increasing in popularity but tablets had touch screens back last century and the chip to operating system interface should stay the same.

My three most stable computers use Ubuntu. One is a server with a very simple and old set of chips selected for compatibility with Linux. The next is a desktop workstation with hardware at least one year old and Ubuntu 10.10 with a lot of updates. The desktop workstation was unstable throughout Ubuntu 10.4 and for the first few months of 10.10. Linux finally caught up with all the hardware in the desktop workstation after a year.

The third reliable computer is a netbook using Ubuntu 11.4 beta 2 with Unity and Gnome effects switched off. Initially the wireless chip would not work at 802.11n speeds and now, after many updates, works reliably at 802.11n speed. There were other problems and now they are gone.

Firefox

Firefox 3.5 was unstable and 11.4 installs the more stable Firefox 4. The netbook has Firefox 4 installed with fewer add-on modules because some of the modules created problems in Firefox 3.5. The result is Firefox not crashing or locking up.

LibreOffice

LibreOffice replaces OpenOffice in Ubuntu 11.4. LibreOffice appears to be OpenOffice with some features missing. I have not used LibreOffice because my first need is text and code processing using Bluefish followed by word processing using Abiword then content editing using Firefox. My medium speed netbook works perfectly with Abiword but slows down when hit with the either of the giant OpenOffice/LibreOffice applications.

Unity

Try Unity. You can easily switch between Unity and Gnome at login.

Conclusion

Ubuntu 11.4 will be the best Ubuntu or Linux distribution if you use Gnome and your computer does not use the Nvidia chip that appears to be the last remaining chip related problem in Ubuntu 11.4 beta 2.

Comments

Ubuntu 11.4 will be the best Ubuntu or Linux distribution if you use Gnome and your computer does not use the Nvidia chip that appears to be the last remaining chip related problem in Ubuntu 11.4 beta 2.

OR MAYBE THE WORST!!!!

I can't stand Unity... from what I've tried of it. But then I hate OSX too.

It confounds me kinda how they have to keep modifying operating systems and desktop managers, yet I find I gain little from all these changes they make. I'm really not interested in learning a new interface every 6 months.

...11.4 disappointed in every way... I just updated from Ubuntu 10.10 and I want to cry. First of all I cannot turn my laptop on!!! Starting previous version is is still possible and will be the only way one can save all his data after updating to the new version...

Fully agree, application menus tied to the Desktop and not to the application Window sucks, unless you run all your application in full screen. All "cool" visual effects that slow down UI may look nice during first 5 minutes, but then you start hating them. The only nice feature in unity is quick search, this is something what I would like to see in Gnome.

Linux Mint will gain ground from users disappointed with Ubuntu 11.4. A lot of Mint users are ex Ubuntu users who found Mint fixed problems faster. Mint is sticking with Gnome 2 for at least one more release. You can test both Ubuntu and Mint side by side using their live CDs. The Mint release occurs a few weeks after the Ubuntu release.

If you follow the Ubuntu "get it" link on the main Ubuntu.com you get the server version so watch for that if you want a desktop. Once I got the desktop 64 bit version on my flash stick it booted forever and I never saw the Ubuntu flash screen. Maybe I should stick to 10.4 or is it a Nvida problem. Ian.

The Ubuntu site is like an early McDonalds menu. You could choose a burger with fries or a burger without fries. The Ubuntu Web site is over simplified to the point where people are disappointed with the result.

http://www.ubuntu.com/download is not explicit about the download in the top row. You are directed to http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/download and that page still misses explicit detail. I use the alternate download, http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/alternative-download because the installation includes the option to use RAID.

Nvidia chips appear to be an ongoing problem that reappears in many Ubuntu releases.

Am running 10.10, also run a website and just want things to work. We film bands and interview, edit and upload. I need a computer that just works and, sorry to say, envy my mates mac. Luckily I don't have the cash so will keep on pluggin Ubuntu.

Lots of people have problems with Macs but they still tell you to get a Mac. I will start with the loss of a $50000 contract because the sales person presented on a Mac and the Mac failed. Macs break with the same frequency as a middle priced PC. Mac notebooks are as expensive as the professional Toshiba notebooks but the Mac reliability is way down by comparison, somewhere just above a Dell. Apple made a big deal about one of the new Mac notebooks being thin, as if Apple had invented thin, despite Intel inventing the technology and Toshiba selling a thin notebook for a year before Apple announced their clone. Then there are all the accessories. The Mac user flashes their thin lightweight notebook in one hand while the other hand drags a suitcase full of adapters and cables to make the Mac work.

I can understand someone buying a Mac desktop back when Macs arrived with their plastic cases coloured to look like the colour range used the year before at Gap. Now you can only buy boring white, although I did see an article about a black Mac that is supposed to be the next in thing because it looks exactly the same as Acer, Asus, Dell, Lenovo, etc. The next thing from Apple will be a clone of the Microsoft tablet. Oh, wait, they did that with the iPad except you also have to buy a keyboard, DVD drive, a bunch of other stuff, and a big carry case.

Then there is the open source issue. Apple use free open source Unix but sell it as a closed proprietary product and they restrict your rights when you use it. The restrictions in iPhones and iPads are far worse than anything from Microsoft.

Hi all... I just want to add my 2 cents about ubuntu 11.04. Well the alternate install is utter crap. I used 10.10's alternate install due to my Raid 0 config... It was working like a charm.. When I decided lets try the upgrade to 11.04. Bad idea, stuffed up my raid completely. I have backups. but now I can't find my 10.10 disc.Which is annoying because I am running off 9.10 live cd and I only have 1 dvd writer and downloading 10.10 now is a waste due to my 1 dvd writer drive. Anyway So my conclusion is wait for proper upgrade for Ubuntu 10.10. 11.04 is just crap it installs Raid 0 fine and grub boot loader loads but just a normal start up screen and there is stays no errors nothing the same with the system rescue. I will just download 10.10 at work tomorrow and write a disc. Redo my linux install. Well that is my 2 cents guys.